Re: Beta version of new software, 17.03.2020
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2020 7:34 pm
Just finished another new panel (1x3 sub boards165mmx120mm panel size with QFN32, MSOP10, 3225, SOT-23, O805) using the beta, which ran much smoother....best yet with very little nudging required before re-flow mainly on the MSOP & QFN. They may have re-flowed accurately as is but better to be sure.
Part way thru the job, I noticed that a wrong nozzle was being selected. (I had the wrong one configured in the job) I hit the pause button as the nozzle change was being completed and then hit the hardware reset button (emergency stop button).
I then went to restart and went thru homing. Once it was finished homing it proceeded immediately to restart the job from where it stopped. I think the vacuum didn't engage but everything else continued. I believe I observed similar behaviour before. So I again hit the Estop button and recovered things.
So it looks like there may not be a clean break (recovery) when pause (and/or Estop) is pressed during a nozzle change as a job is running????
The good news is that the job went much more smoothly with the best placement performance for me to date - maybe the operator is improving .
Panel is just out of the oven now as I am typing this & only a couple of issues caused by the application of paste. If I continue to maintain the current performance it will get lots of use & bye-bye placing by hand
Q: This panel has real fiducials (vs TH fiducials before) and is longer in both X+Y. I wonder do one or both of these factors improve the actual placement accuracy? Of course it could also be related to the circle size feature being more accurate.
Part way thru the job, I noticed that a wrong nozzle was being selected. (I had the wrong one configured in the job) I hit the pause button as the nozzle change was being completed and then hit the hardware reset button (emergency stop button).
I then went to restart and went thru homing. Once it was finished homing it proceeded immediately to restart the job from where it stopped. I think the vacuum didn't engage but everything else continued. I believe I observed similar behaviour before. So I again hit the Estop button and recovered things.
So it looks like there may not be a clean break (recovery) when pause (and/or Estop) is pressed during a nozzle change as a job is running????
The good news is that the job went much more smoothly with the best placement performance for me to date - maybe the operator is improving .
Panel is just out of the oven now as I am typing this & only a couple of issues caused by the application of paste. If I continue to maintain the current performance it will get lots of use & bye-bye placing by hand
Q: This panel has real fiducials (vs TH fiducials before) and is longer in both X+Y. I wonder do one or both of these factors improve the actual placement accuracy? Of course it could also be related to the circle size feature being more accurate.