gas for extending solderpaste print-to-place time?
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:26 pm
Okay, I know this is a long shot and maybe this isn't the most appropriate forum, but I didn't really know where else to ask.
Is there some sort of gas (nitrogen?) in which solderpaste-printed PCBs can be stored that will extend the amount of time allowed between printing and placing? Obviously the boards would be refrigerated too.
I'm pretty sure a vacuum is a bad idea; the main goal here is to keep the flux activators, adhesives, and solvents from evaporating, and a vacuum would just accelerate that process.
I have a somewhat complex solderpaste printing arrangement because of the extremely high-aspect ratio apertures needed for LGA mounting. I can't use my favorite solderpaste (Loctite GC10) for this job -- it has an insane abandon time (manufacturer says 24 hours, in practice I've gone four days with no degradation) but it jams up inside the stencil apertures very badly if you're pushing the limits on area ratio. And it's hard to clean out of thick stencils -- GC10 is strictly for 0.100mm stencils, no exceptions. I also need a lower reflow temperature for the first pass through the oven, and GC10 doesn't come in a PbSn version. So I have to use Kester EP256, which is an outstanding solderpaste, but it has a very very very short process window -- quality starts to degrade very quickly after being exposed to air for only 4-8 hours. It's great paste, but very "high maintenance" during all the steps up to reflow.
Anyways the setup and cleaning time for my printing setup is really killing throughput here... I could probably print the entire job (which is huge) in one day if I focused on it, but it'd take at least a week to finish placing all the boards even assuming everything goes 100% smoothly during placement (which it never does). Right now I only print as many boards as I'm sure I can place in one day, and I'm spending way too much time setting up and cleaning up the stenciling situation. I also have a somewhat elaborate ventilation system since I've become sensitized to the flux fumes, and that adds startup/shutdown overhead as well.
Any ideas?
Is there some sort of gas (nitrogen?) in which solderpaste-printed PCBs can be stored that will extend the amount of time allowed between printing and placing? Obviously the boards would be refrigerated too.
I'm pretty sure a vacuum is a bad idea; the main goal here is to keep the flux activators, adhesives, and solvents from evaporating, and a vacuum would just accelerate that process.
I have a somewhat complex solderpaste printing arrangement because of the extremely high-aspect ratio apertures needed for LGA mounting. I can't use my favorite solderpaste (Loctite GC10) for this job -- it has an insane abandon time (manufacturer says 24 hours, in practice I've gone four days with no degradation) but it jams up inside the stencil apertures very badly if you're pushing the limits on area ratio. And it's hard to clean out of thick stencils -- GC10 is strictly for 0.100mm stencils, no exceptions. I also need a lower reflow temperature for the first pass through the oven, and GC10 doesn't come in a PbSn version. So I have to use Kester EP256, which is an outstanding solderpaste, but it has a very very very short process window -- quality starts to degrade very quickly after being exposed to air for only 4-8 hours. It's great paste, but very "high maintenance" during all the steps up to reflow.
Anyways the setup and cleaning time for my printing setup is really killing throughput here... I could probably print the entire job (which is huge) in one day if I focused on it, but it'd take at least a week to finish placing all the boards even assuming everything goes 100% smoothly during placement (which it never does). Right now I only print as many boards as I'm sure I can place in one day, and I'm spending way too much time setting up and cleaning up the stenciling situation. I also have a somewhat elaborate ventilation system since I've become sensitized to the flux fumes, and that adds startup/shutdown overhead as well.
Any ideas?