thereza wrote:o·pen-source
my final point is i could give a flying f* what you think.
you're an unkown person behind a computer trying to dictate how i spend my (not) free time and effort and energy. I didn't agree to anything when I decided to enhance the software. I chose to do it because i wanted to. what would make you think i would care what you thought?
Sorry thereza, If somebody uses f.. words in a forum he IMHO disqualifies himself.
As it seems you are not willing to work as a team.
OK I will take that and leave you do your work. Best would be that you publish your own version in a GitHub branch of your own if you get to be capable of using GitHub. Then anyone can pick what he thinks is valuable from your source and implement it if he likes and in the style he likes. It's open software you said!
But I wish that Juha merges only important modifications from you and other contributors in an upward compatible style.
I and probably many other Litplacer customers do not want to loose work by some nice but incompatible file format change. Therefore I already suggested versioning in an other thread .
I also wish that the published software is built on the parts- especially the cameras and the TinyG as is - that Juha supplied.
Why ? because I bought the Liteplacer to assemble my companies project prototypes and hopefully for small production volumes which are too expensive to be done by a commercial smd assembler.
BTW: Contrary to you - are you a girl Thereza or a boy the-Reza? - you can see who I am in my user info here in the forum.